• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The real reason behind tech illiteracy is phones, with their 100% PC independent and 100% locked down ecosystems.

  • ElementalPhoenix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think for the past couple of decades windows and mac have had similar levels of complexity for the average user. Most people dont do anything more than going through an install wizard

    • Wronnay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      But most Linux Distributions also have a Install-Wizard and even GUIs for installing software…

      I would even say installing a normal program on Ubuntu via the Softwaremanager is easier than installing a normal Windows Executable since Windows adds the extra Steps of having to search and download it and afterwards to read the software terms and mark the checkboxes

      The only more complex step with Linux is downloading the ISO and booting from it

      -> So just the Distribution of the initial OS is easier with Windows and macOS for Desktop, for Mobile we anyway won as Linux-Community with having Android on most phones

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Best use of a Mac is to sell it and buy 2 computers to put Linux on.
    To fix Windows problems, reboot (and pray)
    To fix Linux problems, Be root.

    • nummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had a job developing software for datacenter machines’ hardware and software health. And the most common automatic repair that we had was escalating 1. reboot; 2. reinstall OS; 3. check hardware. I know it’s different but it was fun to see it “first-hand”.

      And also, “to create Linux problems, be root” works as well.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hey, if it’s an Intel Mac they run Linux great. I’m using a 2011 iMac running Linux Mint going on two and half years and haven’t had any issues!

      (I know that more recent Macs have Asahi Linux, but I’ve not used it and cannot speak to it)

    • JayDee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Macs can actually be really good linux computers. It’s not always straightforward, but I’ve heard good things once it’s installed.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anything running Linux can be good of course- just not going to easily convince me that paying double (or more) is rational.

        • Acrimonious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree with you but you don’t pay double when you buy an old “obsolete” Mac and install Linux on it. Granted, my computer needs are very basic but my 13 yr old Mac is running better than ever after I got rid of MacOs.

        • sompreno@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Macbooks aren’t really always overpriced anymore. Macbook neo is among the best value at its price range and m5 Mac air is roughly comparable with other of its tier.

          Not sure if either can run Linux yet tho

          • Xatolos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            MacBook supported for 7 years and then no more updates vs 10+ years of support on average.

            I guess if you dont mind the forced obsolescence and ewaste, maybe?

            • sompreno@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well yeah that’s a huge issue infecting the vast majority of the arms computing space which sucks a lot but not a uniquely apple issue. Windows seems to be heading in the same direction such as with the Microsoft surface laptops which also have a 6 year end of life and to a lesser extent most laptops have about 6 year of driver support.

              This can be fixed in most laptops by switching to Linux but the issue is still there.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since when did this become an autistic trait? I joined the school computer club when I was 14. It started that year with a single IBM PC. We did not load Linux because it didn’t exist for another decade otherwise I’m sure we would have. I have to believe that kind of curiosity and learning still exists without one needing to be autistic. Then again, under current diagnostics for autism, we might all have been on the spectrum since we were all geeks on some level.

  • Leviathan@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wasn’t autistic, I was poor and switching to Linux made old hand-me-down computers work like new. It also frustrated me a lot, but that’s part of the game.

      • khánh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        but “exclusion” is, lol

        ps autists will not skew the results, there are vastly more normal kids than autists, and even then only a subset of autists are into IT, making the results skew smaller. i guess you could call it cherry-picking, cuz youre picking from what is supposed to be a random set of people

        • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I dont think you meant normal in a disparaging way towards autistic people, but I think the more appropriate word would be neurotypical

          • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Yeah, that is an unfortunate clash between scientific definition of “normal” ie: a statistical distribution which follows a normal curve, or a sample which has very high likelihood of being part of such a distribution.

            I think this is also a part of the reason why many physicists use the word “Gaussian curve” rather than “normal curve” just to avoid ambiguity with the common word “normal”.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    The first 3 computers I ever touched were an Apple II, Apple II e, and a Powemac.

    Then I spent a decade in the Windows wilderness. Back and forth… Now safely home to Linux.

    Maybe not a good question by itself.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      That was definitely back before Apple went crazy with their whole closed ecosystem. Apple II feels a lot more like linux these days considering the amount of documentation available about the hardware. And parts aren’t locked down with serial numbers like in the iPhone…

      I had a lot of fun as a kid messing with an Apple IIgs. One of the games I had was “Thexder”, and you can probably guess where I got my username.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The question really does need to be separated out by era. Are we talking Mac System 7 vs Windows 3.1, Mac OS 9 vs Windows 98, early OS X vs Windows XP, Intel Macs versus Windows 7, ARM Macs vs Windows 10, etc.? Each generation had a different user paradigm, and people who were good with one versus another might mean different things than other generations.

  • alecsargent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is the hypothesis that people in those two OS’s have no clue about other OS’s and the one thats looks like a fruit have a superiority complex?

    • red_tomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      197
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Linux users are particularly notorious for not having superiority complex.

      I use Arch btw

    • thain@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      i think the hypothesis is that windows kids have general tech literacy and problem solving skills and OSX kids dont. and linux users are autustic ;-]

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        The most powerful things windows can do are gui based and the most powerful things macos can do are in the cli

        Not saying everyone bothers going that deep but there is a reason most software engineers and other professionals would prefer mac over windows

        Windows is an inconsistent mess and their terminal tools are afterthoughts

        • glibg10b@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t know if that’s accurate. Have you seen PowerShell? It’s so good, some people install it on Linux to use as their main shell

          • dudeface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nonsense, c# developers might install it on Linux but nobody who understands unix like systems considers it

              • dudeface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I use it daily, there is no point putting it on a unix like system

                One day we will be rid of windows servers and I won’t have to use poweshell ever again

                • Hawke@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  And that’ll be a sad day; powershell is one of approximately two great things that Microsoft ever did.

                  It’s a little verbose in its commands, but it’s very good.

            • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              This is incorrect. And the GNU tools would be much better if they were object-oriented like PS is. No I don’t have PS on my personal machines (Cachy btw) but that’s genuinely a super great feature. It’s an idea who’s time has come (ages ago)

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              That might be true if *NIX had another shell with an object-based pipeline, or if PowerShell wasn’t object-based

              I’d argue most people who dismiss PowerShell offhand like that don’t understand it particularly well

              • dudeface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Most gnu / bad tools are essentially objects, you just have to xarg the column you want

                Object orientated anything is pretty terrible

                • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Yeah, having to take the extra steps to parse strings every time is far superior to objects that can sort, filter, and give you the exact properties you need natively

                  I mean, if your complaint is a heavier overhead, sure, but for most uses as an interactive shell or for smaller scripts, I don’t really see how that would negatively impact you in meaningful ways compared to having to splice raw text and hope the package maintainer doesn’t decide to add a column in a future update

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          The most powerful stuff will always be script/CLI/shell based. Guis only work so and so well, but having multi step procedures requires something else.

          Windows included

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        That would be a very weird conclusion when Macs were generally the ones taught in school, and are also based on BSD.

        • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          A lot of apple’s design philosophy hides the technical detail, to try and create a friction-free user experience. Android does the same thing, but apple were doing it earlier and on desktop devices to some extent. Windows back in the day was significantly more transparent, although I don’t know if I can say the same for modern windows

          That’s well and good for some things, but the concern that it reduces the natural tendency to become highly tech literate is genuine.

          • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            add to that that for some time in history it was quite common to build your own pc (something that abviously went away with rise of laptops), which required whole other level of understanding.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            This has been my experience and have anecdotal evidence of people who can use a Mac but don’t understand any of it. One customer we had problems with until we just cut it off was that she’d have issues with her Mac and couldn’t navigate it effectively to try troubleshooting. She didn’t understand how to install on it so we could run remote management software.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            You used entirely different OSes than me then. Macs were not easy to use while windows was standard. If you were using a Mac you were learning a lot more since the majority of PCs in homes were windows and you didn’t have to do anything on them.

            • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              No. The only hard thing with macs was and is tivoization, because they want to decide what you can install and what not; that’s the reason why jailbreaks and things as brew and all that had to be created.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                That is only recently. If you actually did a study across all kids from when Macs first came out, they would lean heavily opposite of what you’re saying.

                Also brew is a wild thing to say is “Apple deciding what you can install”. Windows literally didn’t even have a package manager until recently. So either your argument is that you couldn’t install things properly on windows until recently or your argument is that it was harder to install stuff on Mac the further back in time you go. Both of those logical paths lead to “Mac is harder and more technical to use” rather than the opposite.

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          your car’s main control unit may also be based on bsd (i have no idea whether that is in fact the case) but surprisingly most people would not call themselves experts on car electronic just because they drive a car.

          while a lot of people considers themselves to be “it experts” just because they were raised by youtube instead of their parents since the age of 2.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          My school system used macs before OSX and switched to Windows almost entirely when OS 9 was still the latest thing. Sounds like another user had the same experience. OS 9 was nothing like unix and had no terminal even, to my knowledge.

        • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Apple hasn’t always used a Unix-like system, though. The old Mac OS on those school computers was it’s own beast.

          And now it seems like schools go for either chromebooks or tablets anyway.

    • nummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think one of the reasons is that MacOS didn’t really have any games back then, so there was no reason for a kid to be glued to their computer. And if you use something for a long time, you collect problems and ways to solve them, getting the experience and some technical knowledge along the way.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Number munchers and Oregon trail have entered the chat. Also the dozen other games on floppy disks (that my middle age mind cannot remember now) that we played on our Apple IIe’s.

        • sartalon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          My mom worked at Software Etc in the 80’s.

          There were so many more, and better games, for PCs.

          The only good games on Mac were ones ported from PC.

          I was my mother’s official “troubleshooter”. If a customer returned a game, she gave it to me, to test.

          There were definitely a lot more PC games returned than Mac, but there was almost never anything wrong with them. Probably came down to individual setups.

          Which was Mac’s strong point. There was no real diversity in hardware, so everything worked.

          But all the Mac games SUCKED compared to PC.

          Unfortunately, this was also when I was exposed to Ultima IV… and my homework never saw me again.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Were you under the impression I don’t believe there were pc games back then? I didn’t say that, also, funny enough you say

            The only good games on Mac were ones ported from PC.

            But the only games I specifically named actually were on Mac first then later ported to DOS.

        • nummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not so sure but I think back THEN there were less captivating PC games as well. My perspective is from the early 00s Russia, when you had to deal with pirated games, unbelievably slow Internet, funny videos shared between friends on CDs, going with a hard drive to a friend’s house just to share your music collection, etc. Basically, we had to know how to do this kind of stuff because the alternative was so expensive. Now with LLMs you don’t even have to “google” anymore, so there’s no need to know, for example, what a file extension is.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Interesting perspective. I was in the rural US and my experience was probably closer to yours than you might think. 33-48kbps modems were insanely slow, even back then. Between that and my parents banning the Internet in the house, most everything I got my hands on was pirated, and either painstakingly (secretly) downloaded over midnight hours on the unreliable modem or from a floppy disk or burned CD from a friend! This was circa 1997-2001 until I moved out and got a usable Internet connection.

            • nummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, that checks out, I usually notice a 10-20 years “cultural” gap. Personal anecdote: watching The Sopranos in 2020s still felt like the topics in russian media and culture are just starting to catch up, before that no one really talked about depression as a disorder, and people taking ADs were seen as “crazy”.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yep. A lot of people also say that the rural US is typically about 20 years behind california in a few ways, which I also agree with.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Huh? Mac had the better games! In fact I lived in the countryside and our school was mostly Macs until I got to high school.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The time period we are discussing is 25-45 years ago. Macs haven’t been a thing kids have “grown up on” in decades, so I’m guessing you’re quite young. Mac games blew Windows games out of the water for years.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Mac had heaps of games in the 80s and 90s. Then from the 90s to the 2010s, it was WINDOWS TIME for games, with some being ported to OSX and Linux or run with compatibility software. Now it’s Windows/Linux hardcore and still only small or modest Mac support.

            Mac did have a ton of fun games back then, though! I didn’t get a Mac of my own until Intel Core Macs came out, but I loved the Macs I used at my friends’ houses and school.

            I went through an edgy “Apple is worst computers” phase in the 2000s, but I grew to like the hardware and OS after I picked one up to install Windows on to bring to LAN parties (all non-Mac laptops that could play games fuckin suuuuuucked back then and I was never at home.)

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t know about better, but the Mac games I had in elementary school were awesome for kids that age. Oregon trail and number munchers. I don’t think pc gaming had really taken off much at all then. That was years before doom, even.

          • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            In the 90s, especially early 90s, the hardware was just plain faster and more capable. Coupled with a remarkably robust shareware community, gaming was great on them. The difference between Doom II (the PC-DOS game everyone remembers) and Marathon, which was its mac contemporary, was ridiculous. Textures, resolution, gameplay complexity, the ability to actually look up and down, etc.

            Then Gil Amelio tried to turn them into a business-focused company for a few years, and mac gaming never fully bounced back from that. I mean, it almost did. Halo was going to be a Mac exclusive at launch, and then Microsoft bought out Bungie right before launch to sell their new X-Box.

            • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I don’t know whether that example is so convincing.

              Marathon does look more advanced than Doom II, but Doom II was not much more than an extra campaign for Doom (with bigger levels).

              Doom was one full year Earlier than Marathon. While it may not seem a lot right now, back then that was a long time. One year after Marathon, Duke Nukem 3D came out, and that looked already like big leap.

              And 6 month later we got Quake, that is suddenly in full 3D instead of having sprites for the characters.

              • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                No, that’s fair. Marathon came out about 1 year after the first Doom. But it ran at full 24 bit color, higher resolution, had gameplay mechanics such as secondary triggers, magazine-based weapons, maps that were proper 3D (Doom I and II couldn’t really loop parts of the map under/over each other, as it was essentially still a 2D map with 3D visuals). Basically during the 90s, a game was already obsolete once it was maybe a couple years old. More than anything, Marathon has a proper story and story writers, but that’s more about the gaming environment at the time than the hardware. Bungie pre-microsoft was kind of amazing. Them and Ambrosia Software were top of their niches.

                Duke Nukem was another leap, although they still hadn’t quite figured out the whole “look up or down without severe distortion” that so many 3D shooters in the mid 90s suffered from.

                But yeah, prior the the Pentium becoming the mainstream processor that most people would have in their machines, those Motorola 68k’s were powerhouses.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That’s the time period we’re discussing lol. The OP literally talks about kids growing up on Macs. No kids have grown up on Macs in school for decades. It’s either iPhones or iPads since then.

              So yeah I’m talking about 30 years ago, no shit. And no I’m not having trouble processing anything, it just seems like most people in this thread didn’t tie the time period together properly (probably correlates pretty well with the question honestly!).

          • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re either very young, or didn’t have access to Mac’s as a kid. The games were great. Number Munchers was sick.

            • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t think 40 (how long ago Number Munchers came out) can be considered “very young.”

              • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes, that’s my point. He’d have to be in his 20’s to have missed all the early Mac games.

                If he’s 40 he for sure would have either played them, or just never been around Mac’s as a kid.

                • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  He’d have to be in his 20’s to have missed all the early Mac games.

                  More like 30s, minimum. If you were born 30 years ago in 1996, by the time you’re able to use a computer it’s already 2000 and Mac is left behind.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It will depend on the age, but using Windows used to require some tech literacy. As far as I’m aware, Apple has always tried to avoid this need, which also prevents learning it. Modern Windows isn’t much different than modern Mac though. I’m assuming kids on Windows today aren’t much better than kids on Mac.

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Controversial opinion but the system working well doesn’t prevent learning about it—if the user wants to. Like Apple computers are still computers, they’ve always had development tools. You could always study it under the hood and learn.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think that’s controversial. However, there’s two ways people will be encouraged to learn about it. Either the system invites you to tinker, or it doesn’t function how you want and requires you to tinker. Apple, in all of their products, mostly does neither. It functions fine, and it is opinionated about how it functions and doesn’t invite you to change it.

          Sure, there will be curious people who, no matter what, tinker. They don’t need to be encouraged. The OP isn’t really trying to measure them. They’ll be the baseline where there is no measurable difference. The average user is what we want to understand. The average user on Mac isn’t expected to understand anything about the system. It just works. Both Windows (historically) and Linux do some amount of inviting you to tinker, and also requiring you to (depending on distro for Linux this may not actually be required). Windows has increasingly locked things down though, and also revert any changes on update more and more frequently.

      • alecsargent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, MacOS hold the users hand way too hard, in a way that is insulting in my opinion.

        I’m assuming kids on Windows today aren’t much better than kids on Mac.

        Totally right, I have seen it in person.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember this meme from when the Berlin Wall fell and everyone in the DDR got access to Ubuntu.

  • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have full time Linux users on my team. I fix their code all day and go home to use all 3 os’s.

    Using Linux means you like tinkering, not that your smarter or more capable.

    • daggermoon@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      In my case, I used Linux because I didn’t like being spied on. I also didn’t like ads and I hated my settings being reverted after Windows updates. Fuck Windows. It’s an OS that doesn’t understand consent.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m sure sometimes your code needs fixing.

        But this whole thread is a bait. zzzzzzz

      • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is this sarcasm? God damn I was a bit riled.

        In the case that I’m actually not understanding your confusion, I’m a Staff engineer for 15 or so devs. Everyone makes mistakes (myself included) and everyone is fluent on nix systems.

        But I’m running Colima and podman on osx because it’s a vastly easier os to use in a work environment. I’d choose windows + wsl over native desktop nix. And it has nothing to do with my capabilities.

    • lauha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been using linus for like 27 years or so, but I don’t think I’ve been tinkering with my desktop for 20 years. Tinkering with my servers of course.

    • lemmygarden@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m an Ubuntu user and don’t give a shit about tinkering or being smart. I just like that it’s faster than Microsoft and isn’t Microsoft. Also when windows needs to update it’s a whole thing. Fuck a whole thing. Apple products are also stupid.

    • Kichae@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The question the OOP is getting at isn’t about being smarter or more capable. It’s about knowing how to probem solve, which is itself about feeling like it’s ok to tinker.

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Liking to tinker things is somewhat correlated to being more capable or even smarter, though; I mean, you can’t tinker if you’re not capable and/or don’t know how to do it.

      With LLMs you can theoretically tinker, but in my experience, 90% of the output will be hallucinated.

  • HouseWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    I almost never seen Macs irl growing up, it was very much Windows country where I live. So obviously when I asked for a computer as a kid it came with Windows, in my case Vista…

    Only in the last maybe 8? years I started seeing people who used Macs irl and it tends to be younger people who only have a Macbook for online school stuff.

    Also yes I’m the only Linux desktop user I know, Even the servers in every office I’ve worked in have been Windows.

    • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which country? Similar feeling here. Then when I went to engineering school there were a few linux users. Into the workforce; some linux server stuff, Novell, redhat etc, mostly windows. All desktops windows. Moved away for 8 years, come back and its a lot of Macs, and some Linux workstations. Wild times. I now know quite a few linux users. Some who have macs for work but run linux at home. Or like me have just completely gone linux.

      • HouseWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Rural England in my case, I do see a lot more Macbooks in coffee shops when I end up in the cities.

        But I’ve yet to see any Linux systems in any place around here I’ve worked at. I’ve not officially worked in any I.T. role before, but I’ve ended up forced into a server closets when everything’s going to shit before a deadline. And every time it’s either desktop Windows or Windows XP server 2003.