At the start of November, Chris Phillips, Google's vice president and general manager for education, said K-12 schools will soon have to accept the company's AI services...
Schools shouldn’t ever use tools that interrupt a lesson with an ad.
And we don’t know how much (if anything) it costs the school. It certainly doesn’t cost the student a subscription if that’s what you mean.
I mean yah, not allowing kids access to the internet at all for school Isn’t a terrible idea. Certainly one worth exploring at least. But failing that, minimizing ads online is a good step in that direction.
Schools shouldn’t ever use tools that interrupt a lesson with an ad.
And we don’t know how much (if anything) it costs the school. It certainly doesn’t cost the student a subscription if that’s what you mean.
Why should tax dollars be funneled from one AI-focused company to another?
Especially this one.
If ads on school computers are a problem, great, let’s just drop the whole internet from them.
For exactly the reason I said.
I mean yah, not allowing kids access to the internet at all for school Isn’t a terrible idea. Certainly one worth exploring at least. But failing that, minimizing ads online is a good step in that direction.
You didn’t provide a reason to give this specific AI company money. You just said public schools should shuttle money to private companies in general.
I’m asking about why this specific one.
The reason I gave was that schools shouldn’t use services that have ads.
Kagi is the only ad free search provider.