• Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not simply operating at a loss, absolutely dumping their prices giving away their products for almost nothing to gain market share. They are burning money at an impressive rate, just for some imaginary payoff in the future.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A future where we don’t have jobs so the rich can make more money by selling us stuff? But I won’t have money to pay for stuff! Hmmm!

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The real reason is they want enough money pumped into AI so someone can automate fascism.

        That’s seriously the plan

        Fucking clown world

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        All MBAs and CEOs are like puppies chasing their own tails.

        They want the growth because number go up good. They’ll do anything for number go up. And when number go up, they get the good and then they need to focus on next number go up.

        They have no long term plan other than number go up. For the next few quarters, they can slap AI on anything and number go up. What happens if AI takes all the non manual labor jobs? Or if it turns out AI is useless and they wasted billions on snake oil? They don’t know, cause they were thinking about number go up right now, not number go up later.

        Our economy is a farce.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          and so goes the ouroboros of late stage capitalism until we are back to feudalism

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s hard to imagine that gaining market share is even meaningful right now. There’s such a profusion of stuff out there. How much does it actually mean if someone is using your product today, I wonder?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And, in doing so, they’ve set the market price at that value for the service they advertise, which is more than they deliver already.

      When Ai enters the Valley of Discontent, the price it can set for what it actually offers will be even less than it is now.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The same was true for YouTube, in the beginning they operated at a loss, and when people were hooked on the service, they monetized it.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        YouTube wasn’t created to make money, it was created to watch the wardrobe malfunction.