• grinning_serpent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Gamers push back.” Just like they pushed back against $70 and $80 games by lining up around the block to buy a Switch 2 so they could buy $70 and $80 games to play on it. Like Rockstar will make a mint selling $100 copies of GTA6.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Nah, not all of us. When switch 2 came out (and because I wanted a hand held) I looked at it, poked at in the shop and decided to buy a DS instead. $80 vs $650. If I’d been feeling more generous, I would have gotten a Retroid pocket 5 or something. I didn’t need it.

      The switch 2 is shiny, but it didn’t fill any niche for me that one of my other rigs couldn’t do (Wii, Wii u, $100 emulation box I built).

      “Bigger, better, faster” is a mug’s game. It cannot be won and it’s the lynchpin of capitalism. The way to win is to not play.

      Gaming is a luxury good. If the big players are going to go full retard, let them. Let it all burn while you find greener pastures.

      This goes for all tech (and luxury goods), IMHO. Do more with less.

      Reject the status ladder → identify the actual function → satisfy it with the smallest tool that works = you win.

      Then enjoy the absurdity of $650 Switch 2 (and marvel at the cost of Switch 1 increasing in price. Lol no).

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I suppose if any game is worth $100 it’ll probably be a game from Rockstar. Personally I’m waiting for reviews since there’s literally no point pre-ordering.