Why should I use a raidz array? I use other scalable storage solutions. Encryption at rest is a standard core tenant to cybersecurity. If one of the raidz drives is removed from the array, and you’re not encrypting your datasets, someone could recover data from the drive.
That entirely depends on what your threat model is. You may not get any value out of that feature, but others may want it. One reason may be ease of storage drive disposal upon drive failure; i.e., if your drive is unencrypted and has your personal photos on it and it fails, the data is still recoverable with no easy way for you to destroy the data. If it was encrypted at rest, you wouldn’t have to worry about it because you would only have to rotate the encryption key.
Looks like Ente supports end to end encryption and Immich doesn’t.
Thanks for posting that. I hadn’t heard of falco before. Cncf graduated, open source, cloud native. I’m going to give this a shot.
Would having a duress password at all be what they need to prove intent? Did he go out of his way ahead of time to set it up or is it part of the setup process of the OS?
There’s also a big brigading problem with going against the “common knowledge” of Lemmy. Brave can do no good. Reverse proxy on the internet and you’re secure. Etc.
That your comment is downvoted and barely debated speaks volumes to Lemmy as actual discourse.
Thanks for pointing out the actually definition of security by obscurity. Popularity has nothing to do with it.
I asked WINE devs for WOW64 support back in XP 64-bit days. They argued about it and said no lol. Good to see it finally landed 20 years later.