eleijeep

It’s called multicast

Don’t confuse the broadcast address with multicast!

tenet

Yeah I mean to you it might be pretty simple lego :) but I’m sure lots of people would benefit from it. Even if not to use the same exact setup then to provide an example or starting point for DIY.

Are you planning on sharing the source?

I’ve only recently adopted AI, and only sparingly, mainly for debugging, tests and help with documentation.

I wonder who came up with the name and the logo 🤣

An article about a tweet.

Have you tried both ping4 and ping6 to isolate whether it is ipv4 or ipv6 or both that’s filtering icmp? Also, can you ping other hosts from your server (ie. does the echo-reply get dropped at the input?)

You could also add logging when a packet is rejected so you can see it in your syslog. Put this at the end of your input chain:

log level warn prefix "Input Packet Dropped: "  

Personally for me, the spirit of self-hosting is incompatible with using Cloudflare and Synology services, but I understand that less technical users may prefer commercial services.

It appeals to the people who think a tiling WM looks cool but can’t be bothered to do the most basic documentation reading to install and configure it.

every tech influencer is pushing this distro

Not any of the ones that I follow. Perhaps that’s a signal to curate who you listen to.

Is it because it’s dropping the implied “running,” as in “Windows Services for (running) UNIX (programs)” and “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (programs)”?

trillions

Here are the stories they used, if you want to decide for yourself. Although it won’t be a blind test since in these documents they tell you which is which:

Story pair 1

Story pair 2

Story pair 3

That’s not a point release, though. A point release upgrade is like going from 13.5 to 13.6. That’s usually so few packages that you’d have to do something extreme to break it.

You must have a very strange apt config to break Debian with a point-release upgrade.

You’re confusing two different meanings of stable. When people refer to “stable” distros such as Debian, they are referring to the meaning of stable as “unchanging,” not the meaning of stable as “doesn’t crash.”

A rolling release distro by that definition cannot be stable.

It depends what kind of software exactly. If you need a kernel module driver then you’ll have to make a custom image. It’s pretty easy if you just follow the steps in the docs and use the custom image template, but it’s probably not something a complete beginner would want to do.

I have to do this in order to load the sensors driver for my motherboard sensors, for example. Any software that requires changes to the base image would have to follow this process.

I hadn’t heard of this one before, thanks for posting.

Edit: this website is very strange. The article is dated 5th June 2019 and the other “case studies” are dated to look like they’ve been writing regularly since 2019 up until now. But the article reads like LLM output, and the waybackmachine has no record of this article before December 2025, and no record of the domain name henricodolfing.ch before April 2025. The whois database says that the domain was registered in January 2025. So are they really trying to launder slop by back-dating it to make it look like it was written before LLMs existed? Fuck.

Lots of people who have never used Codeberg and don’t understand the difference between Codeberg and Forgejo are very angry about this.

This is still a problem for OSS licensing, since in order to license a work you need to be the copyright holder.

This might mean that OSS projects find it even more difficult to assert their licenses against violators in court, since they would need to prove that the part of the code that was copied was not AI output.

Banning the output of AI tools in OSS codebases is a sensible move for any project that actually cares about enforcing the license that their code is released under.

Shit website.