• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 26th, 2025

help-circle

  • Good job putting this together! Lots of useful info in your post.

    My eye is locking onto this bit in the logs: vkCreateDevice failed (VkResult: -7). Vulkan is failing to initialize, seemingly because of some missing extension.

    Try these for us and share your output, if you’d be so kind. Feel free to scrub any parts you don’t wanna share with a [REDACTED]. I’m mostly going off memory so some of them may fail and that’s okay:

    sudo dmesg | grep -i err | tail -10
    nvidia-smi
    inxi -Gxx
    which vulkaninfo
    which amdvlk
    which vulkan-intel
    vulkaninfo --summary
    gamescope -- vkcube
    vkcube
    cat /sys/module/nvidia_drm/parameters/modeset
    







  • dgdft@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•I feel seen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Using this plot as a statistical argument against the idea of Dunning Kruger is pretty Dunning Kruger.

    It’s a scatter plot with hella dense overlap and no density indicator, and a best-fit line that doesn’t match the visual skew. Different ranges and scales on the axes are wonky as hell and make it hard to follow a 1:1 reference line. Try tracing a mental line from (75,75) to (150,150) and it looks much cleaner.

    It seems to show subjective vs. evaluated IQ results, which mostly shows people generally think they’re far above average. There’s clearly a statistically significant positive correlation in the trend of modest magnitude.

    More importantly though, it’s a bit of a weird thing to tie to Dunning Kruger: The plot tells us something about how well people can guess how “cognitively gifted” they are relative to peers, but that’s not a reasonable proxy for how people might self-evaluate on a skill-based or knowledge-based domain.

    E: and I went looking for the source and that’s fake, simulated data you’re presenting as real there lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect#Statistical_and_better-than-average_effect