Arthur Besse
cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions
- 6 Posts
- 11 Comments
I believe comma is more widespread per country
it looks like you might be right… I’m surprised to learn that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_separator#Conventions_worldwide lists 83 countries who use comma as decimal separator, and only 59 who use dot (and presumably the thousands separator is usually the opposite of the decimal separator). However there are enough countries which aren’t on either list that it isn’t entirely clear from that page which convention is actually used in more countries.
Also, it’s much more complicated than the
.vs,binary… among other oddities:- Historically, in Germany and Austria, thousands separators were occasionally denoted by alternating uses of commas and points, e.g. “1.234,567.890,12” (or “1.234,567.890·12” in Austria-Hungary and Austria prior to 1938) for “eine Milliarde 234 Millionen …”, but this is not seen today and contemporary German readers would require an explanation to understand it.
- In Switzerland, there are two styles. Currency values use an apostrophe (
') as a thousands separator along with a dot (.) as the decimal separator, like “1’234’567.89”. For other values, the SI-style “1 234 567,89” is used, with a comma (,) as the decimal separator. The apostrophe is also the most common thousands separator for non-currency values, like “1’234’567,89”.
Yes, probably not all but certainly most bugs being found now are.
If the PS5 is based off of Linux
I don’t think it is though? After a few seconds searching I don’t see anything conclusive but PS4’s OS was based on FreeBSD so I would guess PS5’s probably is also. (I see that if you have a PS5 with old enough firmware you can put Linux on it yourself…)
Sony does have some experience shipping Linux-based products though (probably first with Linux for PS2 in 2002, and more recently various android devices) and surely knows how to comply with the GPL.
But still listing year’s old vulnerabilities that got fixed long ago because they are still supporting ancient stuff like 5.10LTS is Debian-specific.
The advisory this meme is about only relates to the 6.12 kernel in Debian 13 “trixie” (Debian’s current stable release), and 1,295 of these 1,313 CVEs are from 2026.
Linux 6.12 is the SLTS (“super long-term support”) release from 2024, so the Linux Foundation’s Civil Infrastructure Platform plans to continue backporting security fixes to it until 2035.
Debian stopped supporting Debian 11 “bullseye” (the one with a 5.10 kernel) in August, but that kernel is also an SLTS which CIP plans to support until 2031.
So, no, continuing support for these kernels is not something Debian-specific.
Here are the versions of linux-image-amd64 in Debian currently:
bullseye (oldoldstable) (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 5.10.262-1 [security]: amd64 bookworm (oldstable) (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 6.1.187-1 [security]: amd64 bookworm-backports (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1: amd64 trixie (stable) (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 6.12.111-1 [security]: amd64 trixie-backports (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 7.1.13-1~bpo13+1: amd64 forky (testing) (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 7.2.8-1: amd64 sid (unstable) (kernel): Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) 7.2.8-1: amd64
Debian problems I guess
Not really; the Linux kernel has had 8500 CVEs so far this year (according to this).
Most of them aren’t actually known to be definitely-exploitable security bugs, but some are. You can read more about how Linux issues CVEs from this post on Greg Kroah-Hartman’s website: Linux CVEs, more than you ever wanted to know (and/or watch one of his talks on the subject which is linked from there).
See also this article from July: Linux kernel team publishes 432 CVEs in two days: Sunday-to-Monday onslaught fuels speculation over AI-assisted bug reports.
Many people do seem to like Arch fwiw
i don’t recommend Arch smh
Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Should we remove XSLT from the web platform?English
2·1 year ago(tldr: libxslt is a significant source of vulnerabilities and it should absolutely be removed from browsers ASAP.)







or we could just consider time as officially ended