Yeah if it’s just a basic input with a function call for spam or not spam the risk is low. What’s the worst case outcome, it tricks it into saying no it isn’t a scam and you have to delete it manually? Hahaha

These statistical models are not capable of that. They are capable of self reinforcing s feedback loop of looking malicious but it’s ultimately just how the numbers align and has nothing to do with actual intent.

The benefit here is the software by design can’t read your traffic - it’s using SNI to route, not the host header, so SSL pass thru keeps the payload private. It’s billed as shareable for that reason.

Also this is open source and you can host it yourself.

Edit: I concede BakedCatboy’s point.

In either case I would probably just use FRP.

I agree and I absolutely will have a double standard here. Do it to a big studio and it’s a fun exploration of how far you can push a refund policy.

Do it to an indie dev and I’m ostracizing you.

I’ve been using micro as well recently. But other than that if I’m on a remote server I’ll use whatever it has available, starting with nano then vi/vim.

Almost as bad as doom regex.

Yes, but it’ll lighten the demand on other DRAM manufacturers, so we should still see some benefits.

virsh destroy gives me so much anxiety.

No I just want to shut it down- oh that’s how I do it. So destroy won’t delete all the data?

I curse whoever decided destroy = shutdown.