I think web browser exploits wouldn’t be an issue on ubuntu anyways, as major web browsers do get regular upgrades there (or are not even installed via apt but snap nowadays). Also web browsers use sandboxes. I’m more worried about users downloading any kind of content and interacting with it via more niche software, like image viewers (though with glycin they nowadays also do sandboxing).

No, I will not spend hours of my time to win an irrelevant internet argument. :P

You are underestimating things. Unmalicious websites can still host malicious content by users, for example.

What if you use for example ubuntu and wait 3 years?

Indeed. And I used my muscles powered by bread to move my internal skeleton to write this.

First of all, I disagree, kind of. You don’t need to know about unreal engine specifics to use arch. On the other hand, I can guess what blueprints are without knowing unreal (therefore I only disagree kind of). On the 2nd other hand, if they’re able and motivated to read up what you mean, they’re likely able to use arch.

Second of all, it’s not really good news, because if they don’t understand the comparison, they will not understand what you told them and therefore just ignore it. A warning in a language that you don’t understand will not stop you.

That’s like using unreal engine and only relying on blueprints without understanding C++.

I like your comparison in this situation. It’s so layman-unfriendly that one can doubt its usefulness. And I’m happy to see that I’m not the only one struggling to find suitable comparisons.