Rioting Pacifist

Monit, simple to setup, gets the job done, runs on my router too.

Put as many layers in your onion as possible, also limit outbiund traffic which will make further exploration more difficult (especially if it’s an automated attack)

My hotest selfhosting take is that stuff I use in my day job, docker/k8s/cloud is not worth it and generally worse for long-term self hosting than a Debian box.

Like I have the skills to troubleshoot containerized setups, it’s litterally my dayjob, but I’d rather not deal with it in my freetime unless there is no other way to run it.

What advantage does it have compared to Matrix?/IRC?

Where AI could be useful, it needs significant investment, if paired with resources it can look for patterns in scans.

However the process an AI uses to make a decision is similar to encoding of an image, so I wonder how it compares in terms of resolution to high resolution pictures produced by MRIs

Not GDPR but the French & German laws which implement GDPR can result in jail time.

laws state one thing, reality is a-whole-nother.

Networks aren’t magic, if people are sending data from your car it’s going to leave a trace, given nobody is showing any traces you might as well be claiming wizards are stalking you.

You sound like one of their paranoid shut-ins that thinks crime rates are going up, even though every metric shows they are going down.

Data isn’t magic, you don’t collect data on everyone’s cars without leaving a network footprint.

In EU this would be a massive GDPR breach and cost the company €20 million or 4% of the company’s total worldwide annual turnover**

In Germany you face Up to 3 years imprisonment or a fine for transferring data to a third party you weren’t authorized to share.

In France Collecting data by fraudulent, unfair, or unlawful means carries up to 5 years.

In California CCPA allows fines up to $7,500 per intentional violation (e.g per customer)

they disclose that shit, just in a very vague way to allow a wide interpretation of what was disclosed.

Firstly misleading disclosures are not valid under both GDPR & CCPA

• GDPR - Consent must be “freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous”

• CPRA definies “dark patterns” as a user interface designed to subvert or impair user autonomy, decision-making, or choice and states outright: agreement obtained through use of dark patterns does not constitute consent.

Secondly do you have any evidence of said disclosures?

Selling tracking data from your customers without disclosing it would absolutely be illegal.

You’d go to jail if you did that in Europe, likely face a huge fine in certain US states too.

Are you saying they have a secret program where they illegally take your data and to pass this data around without your permission they have a secret bulk deal with telecoms peoviders

So your saying they have a secret program where they illegally take your data and sell it to insurance companies?

So they are taking a video of you and in exchange giving you $10-50/month worth of data access?

They aren’t giving you an eSim for free.

My guy have you not heard of 4G and 5G?

So you think they are hiding an undetectable iPhone in your car for free?

Second, this sounds super easy to defeat with a printed photo card and a couple of Googley Eyes. 👀

That’s fine, people are under the mistaken impression that there are bad drivers that would deliberately cheat this, and good drivers like them that pay 100% attention to the road, the reality is there is that 99% of drivers are good drivers ok of the time and distracted drivers some of the time, if the 1% genuinely terrible drivers actively bypass this, it’s still a major improvement for the those of us that share the road with the other 99%.

How does this compare to an ML approach?

are you training or just using an LLM for this?