Amazingly, the answer to #5 is yes!
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: February 6th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
IpsumLauren@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Letsencrypt is under US jurisdiction. Is there a free-er alternative?English
2·1 month agoThat would be just a nuisance until a new certificate is generated with another vendor (possibly not for free, but cheap enough).
IpsumLauren@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Letsencrypt is under US jurisdiction. Is there a free-er alternative?English
65·1 month agoIt opens the possibility of a man-in-the-middle attack.
IpsumLauren@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Letsencrypt is under US jurisdiction. Is there a free-er alternative?English
193·1 month agoFirst let’s identify what parts of the world are free-er than the US (for a certificate).
Same here, I run Mint everywhere I can, and the XFCE edition works especially well in old machines.
Alpine is better suited for servers and especially containers, because the images can be really small. If you got enough RAM, there’s an installation mode that runs on it without writing to disk, pretty cool for systems where you want always to reboot in the same state.
Now I’m curious. What did you try that didn’t work?

Oh snap! That definitely sounds possible. Found more info about it.
tl;dr: Either the attack is ineffective against some browsers that check the certificate transparency logs (like Chrome), or the attack is visible and the CA will lose all its credibility (hopefully being removed from the browsers).