IanTwenty

https://keepass.info/help/v2/sync.html

https://github.com/Kunzisoft/KeePassDX/wiki/File-Manager-and-Sync#data-synchronization

I cannot find confirmation for keepassxc but they check for changes before saving (and I believe offer to merge) as confirmed in this non-issue:

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/12690#issuecomment-3538942799

You could still get conflict files being created by the sync software and would need to watch and merge those manually. However you can mitigate that by saving on every change (this is the default I think) and synching as often as possible between devices.

Keepass (some clients anyway) helpfully merges changes to the underlying file if it changes whilst open so a simple sync of the file is enough.

Here it is again! 153 votes, double the nearest competitor:

https://community.home-assistant.io/t/wth-cant-i-control-what-other-users-can-access-rbac/1030886

Didn’t know this:

Shallow clones are awful. Run your own damn mirror if you’re going to do something nasty like that.

Shallow is the default/recommended in a lot of places though apparently:

Shallow wins the clone, every time, by 4-6x. Which is exactly why actions/checkout defaults to depth=1, why GitLab CI ships GIT_DEPTH=20, and why Vercel hard-codes --depth=2 with no way to change it.

https://bex.co/blog/2026/08/08/git-push-paas-shallow-vs-partial-clone-build-checkout

Separately, one source of the scraping:

welcome to the wonderful world of “proxy SDK monetization.” It’s big business, and your TV is probably doing it.

The link in the article is useful, https://spur.us/blog/smart-tv-apps-residential-proxy-sdks

Amazon makes it explicit: its Device and System Abuse Policy prohibits apps that facilitate proxy services for third parties. Roku has reportedly shut the door too: Lowpass, syndicated at The Verge, reported that Roku bars developers from using Bright SDK and similar proxy services, and that Roku apps using the SDK disappeared after the company was contacted.

LG and Samsung have not drawn an equivalent public line. That is the gap these apps are living in. The same business model that Amazon bans and Roku reportedly blocks is still showing up at scale on webOS and Tizen.

It concludes:

A TV app should not be able to quietly turn a living-room device into residential proxy infrastructure. Screensavers, games, clocks, and novelty apps can be boring, cheap, or ad-supported. If an app is going to monetize a household’s internet connection, the user should be clearly informed about what that means, how the connection will be used, and what risks and tradeoffs they are accepting.

We need to help everyone in the world block their TVs from doing this, this is such an abuse of trust.

They didn’t move fast enough on it and others began circulating it. So they had to play catch up, hence the need to react before they had a patch.

We won’t pretend otherwise: the delay was a structural failure, caused by both the security team’s decision process and its lack of resources. The security team has since started changing its processes, and that work continues, so that decisions can be made by majority and compromises are encouraged.

https://thephp.foundation/blog/2026/10/21/todays-php-security-release-and-how-were-strengthening-php-security/

I do not run Immich but their privacy policy states:

Locally Stored Data: Immich stores all your photos, albums, settings, and other metadata locally on your device. We do not have access to this data, nor do we transmit or store it on any of our servers.

https://immich.app/privacy-policy

Additionally in their docs I can find no mention of connecting to outside services. I do see references to downloading hugging face models.

https://docs.immich.app/features/facial-recognition#how-face-detection-works

One of the newswire articles is a great read

https://blog.colinbreck.com/i-dont-want-to-read-what-you-didnt-write/

Perhaps the laziest and most offensive use of AI writing I have seen: I had someone use AI to summarize my comments on their proposal as their response to me! Thanks! I couldn’t have said it better myself!

So if I understand: hosters will be able to provide the proof at a time/schedule of their choosing. On actual servers a simpler, automated cert renew process without the need for them to hold nameserver API credentials.

Say that new authelia exploit looks like one fail2ban already recognises or relies on timing/brute-force then you’re covered even before a patch is available.

Here’s a real authelia vuln:

https://app.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2026-47203

allowing an attacker to circumvent login throttling or account lockouts by simply altering the case of their credentials.

I think fail2ban would help protect authelia here?

Firewalling containers’ outbound access seems to be rare but another powerful layer of protection