If you are paying for Bitwarden, or using their free tier, stop and and start hosting vaultwarden. You can still use the Bitwarden app, with vaultwarden but with all the premium features.
Its one of the few services I really like paying for tbh.
When nothing (no a/c, washer, work PCs off, etc) is running my house power draw is about 500-800w. So my battery keeps things going until the next day.
Edit: just checked and whole house is 350W this evening.
I pay for their product and its totally worth. It was $10 for the longest time and much like everything in the last few years has increased price to what it is actually worth. To be honest $20 a year is still stupid cheap and worth it to keep them developing the product. Bitwarden is also one of the few password managers that hasn’t had a user data breach.
The only ones I like are paid: Terraria, Dredge, Scythe Pocket Edition, Terraforming Mars etc. Recommended!
Pretty sad but hopefully some of these developers start an indie studio.
Money now! Future prospects? No care, money now!
There is a reason why mobile gaming is mostly garbage.
They most recently bought Bethesda and ActivisionBlizzard.
Which is crazy given the price of gaming has steadily dropped on console.
Correct, if we have something included in a contract we already have there is little reason for us to procure a FOSS tool and maintain a security understanding of said tool and maintain versions.
Organisation of 60K. Job is far too senior, lucrative and actually very enjoyable to consider moving over a puerile thing.
doxygen
There is zero chance for getting this approved to use in our Enterprise.
We have an existing tool that can do this without assessing another tool.
I say irrational because clearly there is a bias here and not an experience being referenced.
That’s completely irrational but you do you. Maintaining documentation is one of the best and safest uses for LLMs in coding - devs generally write bad documentation because they don’t want to do it.
I do run a local instance but what I do is then replicate certain repos out to Github and Codeberg. (The ones I like to keep public)
Codeberg doesn’t allow you to use AI with your repos. Even if it is just writing your docs for you.
Radicle is decentralised though!
Agree but their stance on LLM content is a big put off for me. I don’t share my scripts and things I write with AI but I like to keep them all together.
And it concerns me that Codeberg is the guiding hand for the forjejo project.
LazyLibrarian x2 instances, 1 for audiobooks and 1 for comics and ebooks. Nothing else needed, it uses Prowlarr to check all indexers.
I have a script that converts everything to epub, even epubs to ensure characters are utf8.
Because Codeberg is its own charity type thing they have a cohort of users that vote on decisions made and you cannot even see how they came to that decision because that area is restricted to them. Presumably they might not federate at all.
Yeah I stopped putting anything on codeberg and finished moving to sourcehut after they announced this. I’m stuck with Github due to work but policing whatever random repos I have and want source control is a bit of a dick move.
I have a local forjejo which replicates certain repos to Codeberg and others to Github. Now I have to adjust my integration.
Thank you sir, the posted article is paywalled