Imo if the person moves the responsability to a third party, he should still be responsible for what happens. The wait sounds reasonable to me, as then people can see how responsible the dev or “dev” shows to be towards the project he is managing.

And by that, it allows separating those just using LLMs as additional tools, from “adventurers” (local expression for people that do things without a plan), scammers and asset flip users going for an even quicker buck.

unixsocks moment 🫣

Mind rule 2 buddy

Not familiar with software for streaming, but maybe bluetooth HDMI would serve the purpose?

not deer

Been using for some 2~3 years now a Nitro 5 laptop almost always set to the Nvidia GPU. Issues are very rare, and some times compatibility is actually better than with the other GPU, the Intel one. Also worth noting I use Linux Mint though, and been some years since I last tested systems based Arch (btw).

UE games looks rubbery/plastic to me since at least the PS3, the point which I started paying attention. No matter how good a dev is, sadly I can’t hold hopes for such a promise.

Licenses are far older than digital contents, and the PS Vita, which I wonder which is the company behind it, gave a concrete example that consoles can make backups, and that’s halfway there.

Furthermore, another platform, GOG, explicitly states in its service contract that users are allowed to keep the contents they get. Similarly, when the service was active, Humble Bundle’s Humble Trove explained right at the beginning of its page that games included in the selection were free to be kept once downloaded. Two examples of decently-sized for-profit companies allowing for digital ownership.

Sony’s defence to me sounds a lot like gaslighting.

Can’t help with so little details.

For prices, no. For the social aspect, yes.

angy

Perfection.

Since it’s missing from the OP, here’s the thread on GOG’s own forum where people report those issues, and with the Google doc attached to the opening post:

https://www.gog.com/forum/general/games_that_treat_gog_customers_as_second_class_citizens_v2/post1

Directly, not familiar with any (unless you’re willing to mess with SBC Android), but I would try using AntimicroX, a program to remap controller keys as keyboard keys and mouse commands, and then set it to auto-start.

They could start releasing on GOG, just saying.

Only one there was released iirc apparently due to inherited contractual obligations from a company they bought.

When everything’s data that could be harvested for who knows what nefarious reasons, I’d rather not risk their “can’t read” to be actually “pretend not to be able to”, specially coming from Microsoft.

Good idea. And if @goofsqueak@lemdro.id goes for it and is concerned about the physical drive with Windows potentially tempering with the Linux install or reporting back to MS or whomever else whatever it finds, goofsqueak could unplug the Linux drive before plugging the Windows one, so no physical access to the main system is given to Windows.

And to goofsqueak, any problem with Fortnite on the Switch? I don’t play games as services so I wouldn’t know, and at least from my experience with offline games, if the problem are graphics, Fortnite from the little I know of, I don’t think would lose much in terms of quality.

Afaik Fortnite blocks access to Linux users due to anticheat? Options that come to mind are running on a VM with Windows, playing on consoles, and playing on a burner computer with Windows installed on bare metal.

But people can always report works that may be breaching TOS or showing materials not representing the final product.

Isn’t “alleged” used to refer to something thought to be, but yet to be proven? Attached image makes it seem pretty obvious, but in case it hasn’t yet been proven, wouldn’t it need to be before the tag is added?