• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not a major problem AND going after 3D printing doesn’t actually solve the problem - the core components that make a gun a gun, such as the barrel, firing pin, etc., still need to be manufactured in the “traditional” way (unless you’re trying to make a single use, one shot gun, but even that has better alternatives than 3D printing).

    As it’s been pointed out above, the pieces of equipment - lathes, mills, CNC machines - required to make the aforementioned parts require no licencing, no safety mechanisms to prevent gun part manufacturing.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      The CA law includes all manufacturing machines that take sets of instructions, if I’m not mistaken

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        A lathe takes no instructions and is potentially the most useful tool of all listed for the purposes of making a gun.

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            They are.

            A barebones manual lathe is still grades cheaper, this provide a lower level of entry. Spend $200 and in no time you can be doing 20-30 barrels a day.

            But please tell me how a 3D printer, which is at most useful for the casing (which you could hand craft from wood with a knife…).

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m not quite understanding your question.

              3d printers have made guns. They are always bad guns because plastic isn’t great for the purpose. They work and prove the point enough to scare people who know nothing about guns and thus don’t realize why other methods are better and faster.

              • fonix232@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                My point is that a 3D printer isn’t necessary for making a gun, and that you can’t even make the parts that make something into a gun, using a (regular, commercial FDM) 3D printer.

                it’s like trying to regulate printers because you can “3D print a car”, when in reality you can 3D print a few accessories and components but the entire engine has to be manufactured differently…