

Which is precisely why it works with a model.


Which is precisely why it works with a model.


If you berate it enough, you can maybe also get it to go off the guardrails.


“It’s a necessary tool. We need this tool to combat evil,” he said.
What a shit ending. No. It’s not necessary.


No. That’s an algorithm.
So is filtering to only friends and hiding blocked users.
So no algo, no feed at all really.


You’ve complicated this. They say to contact them on non-emergent line to make sure it’s a good time for a test. What problem do you think you’re solving?


I’m uninterested in debating the merit of the article. I was simply providing you objective information.


It’s in the article. In fact, that’s what the article is about.


Doesn’t matter which way they vote, they’re getting attacked. When your populace is split, what are you supposed to do?


They’re meant to survive hits without causing damage. They bend over. It’s flexible rubber. They do that so people making mistakes don’t cause damage.
That looked like a turning guide but then ended. I’d have been confused too. I’d have backed out tho!
Point is, this wasn’t dangerous or damaging. If you consider that not a small mistake, what would a small mistake be?


That was a non-issue. Those are little plastic things it bumped. They’re meant to be hit.
Car made the tiniest mistake and dude inside is acting like it’s dangerous.
The new AI summary at the top is quite helpful imo.
If it made financial sense, any bank would give a loan for a project whose generation offset a greater cost than the monthly payment. Assuming decent business history.
The companies that sell these projects likely partner with some financial institutions to offer loans.
So I don’t think this is a liquidity issue.