

Lets see… no privacy policy, no TOS, no legal info, no replies to anyone in 3 hours since posting this. Pass.
Free Software Enthusiast


Lets see… no privacy policy, no TOS, no legal info, no replies to anyone in 3 hours since posting this. Pass.


Its the wrong question. workload matters far more than number of users.
1 user can be too many or 1000 just fine, depending on workload.


Why do all of your posts read like an LLM wrote them?


I use ssh and the built in socks proxy for that ssh -D 1080 some_server will connect to the server and open a socks port on your local 1080 that exits via the server’s IP.


Honest question
yes exactly how i start my real tech questions


I agree that ergonomics are also important, but for me not the top priority for me. For Podman, I like the way I can use Quadlet to quickly deploy and run containerized stuff.
However I really like it for building and running my own app stack pods. The combination of Quadlet and SystemD instance aliases is very powerful. I use this to drive all kinds of configuration automation.


Sounds like you are more interested in how the “house” was painted while I’m more focused on the construction materials and architecture.
If you truly don’t care what the source code looks like or how it works internally, then we aren’t even having the same conversation.


What do you mean by “clean design”?
If you are comfortable reading the source code for each project that is the most revealing way to see the difference.
In short, Docker has a lot more code because it duplicates a lot of kernel and systemd functionality (often poorly), uses multiple components that communication over grpc with each other to do things, requires setuid binaries, and defaults to running everything as root.
Podman, is a straight forward clean simple program that fully uses kernel and systemd interfaces rather than duplicating functionality. Quadlet is build on systemd generators and its use of templates via systemd instances lets you use deterministic dynamic configuration in ways that is unlike anything in Docker.


I think its more than Compose does a small subset of what Quadlets can do. I can understand why if your only use case is Compose and you already like it, why change? For me, the rootless by default and daemonless nature of podman quadlets, and its clean design all make it the preferred choice.


I don’t know how you would even compare them. Quadlets can do what Docker Swarm or Kube does with dynamic instances and dependency lifecycle management. Docker Compose doesn’t have nearly the same features as Podman Quadlet.


podman quadlets are next level
sorry i am a non-metronome owner and thus cannot relate


that’s the test
Going to migrate to infrastructure as code for my documentation
This is the way to do it. Using basic config management and never handjamming anything. I use the git commit log to make notes. That way, later I can check when a file was added or changed and see the explanation for it.


Nice! got a link?


Go for it! I will happily join it


Which place would be the best?
The first place to jumps to mind for me is https://hackaday.com/ and if there is a Threadiverse comm for these kinds of projects I would also like to find it.


That’s a really neat and fun project!
I have a back DSLite that I got the new OS cart for and I’ve been having fun loading it up with emulators and my favorite games from the past. I love how there is such a vibrant community around DSLite hacking.
You should certainly keep doing projects like this and sharing them. I’m glad you shared it because I love hacking projects. However for me this is not on topic for selfhosting even if it is still a very cool project.


Do I understand correctly that what you’ve made is a DSLite client to chat with the apple included model on your laptop?
bot post